Student-Centered Instructional Methods

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) integration of curriculum strategies such as problem-based learning (PBL) and inquiry-based learning are engaging and encourage student learning through collaboration and problem-solving. Students are able to develop 21st-century skills necessary for the future workforce. Technology development is moving very rapidly, leaving very little space for entry level positions where workers cannot think critically to problem-solve integrated problems.

The collaboration piece of PBL and inquiry leads to increased dialogue between students and teachers and students with other students. Allowing students time to speak with each other and develop ideas in a positive learning environment will translate to immediate workplace skills. Encouraging students to use academic language while collaborating will help students develop vocabulary in an academic setting. This is especially helpful for English Students of Other Languages (ESOL) where English is not the student's native language. Providing safe and supportive spaces for language acquisition can encourage English language learners (ELL) to develop confidence while speaking and investigating science phenomena with peers.

References:

Abou-Rjaily, K., & Stoddard, S. (2017). Response to intervention (RTI) for students presenting with behavioral difficulties: Culturally responsive guiding questions. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 19(3), 85–102.

Cartledge, G., Singh, A., & Gibson, L. (2008). Practical behavior-management techniques to close the accessibility gap for students who are culturally and linguistically diverse. Preventing School Failure, 52(3), 29–38.

Geurts, E. M. A., Reijs, R. P., Leenders, H. H. M., Jansen, M. W. J., & Hoebe, C. J. P. A. (2024). Co-creation and decision-making with students about teaching and learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Change, 25(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09481-x

Larson, K. E., Pas, E. T., Bradshaw, C. P., Rosenberg, M. S., & Day-Vines, N. L. (2018). Examining how proactive management and culturally responsive teaching relate to student behavior: Implications for measurement and practice. School Psychology Review, 47(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0070.V47-2

McGuire, S. N., Meadan, H., & Folkerts, R. (2024). Classroom and behavior management training needs and perceptions: A systematic review of the literature. Child and Youth Care Forum, 53(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-023-09750-z

Mitchell, B. S., Hirn, R. G., & Lewis, T. J. (2017). Enhancing effective classroom management in schools: Structures for changing teacher behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417700961

Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007